High Wind Watch Cancelled; More Typical “Windstorm” Instead

10pm Saturday

I’m not working today or tomorrow, but after that dramatic post yesterday I figure I should provide some sort of update.

All evening models are in  and all (except NAM) agree on a landfalling surface low on the Olympic Peninsula tomorrow afternoon.  They are a LITTLE bit weaker than 24 hours ago.  As a result of no “huge wind” solutions on models (closer or deeper low), the NWS cancelled the High Wind Warning and went with a Wind Advisory instead here in the valleys.  A Wind Advisory covers gusts 39-58 mph, which means just about every wind event we get that gives us outages and tree damage.  It takes a lot to get widespread gusts above 58 mph in our climate.


  • Gusty wind arrives on the coast mid/late Sunday morning.  Gusts 65-75 mph are likely, especially north coastline
  • The western valleys should experience wind ON AVERAGE similar to what we saw about 10 days ago or possibly a little stronger.  A minor windstorm with a bunch of power outages (maybe 15,000 PGE customers?) and some trees down. Gusts 35-45 mph with a few spots to 50 mph for us.  If I were a betting man, I’d say a gust 45-50 mph at PDX midday or early afternoon.
  • We do not expect a big historic windstorm Sunday.  That’s one where 80-150,000 customers lose power, but you’ll definitely hear it blowing and see some effects.
  • Gusty south wind blows hardest in the valleys 11am-3pm.  It may arrive suddenly in that time just before lunch as well.

What has changed in 24 hours?…not too much, but a subtle shift towards slightly weaker low pressure and now consistent landfall location.  As a result gradients appear weaker inland.  For Eugene to Olympia, this is what models are showing with 00z runs:

RGEM=12, WRF-GFS=10, ECMWF=14, NAM-MM5=20!

That’s quite a range of solutions isn’t it?  Assuming models are handling the depth of the low correctly, we should escape a big windstorm here.  Stronger wind to the north and west of us closer to the surface low.

Here is the WRF-GFS at 1pm:


Notice the gradient “stacking” is not too tight in the Willamette Valley.  Compare that with the gradients last March 15th’s storm that gave us gusts 45-55 mph…not as tight.

The NAM-MM5 has continued to be stronger and farther south…3pm tomorrow:


That’s a huge windstorm up in SW Washington!

Note the GFS ensemble low locations (21 of them!) all keeping the low farther north, not down south like the NAM when it makes landfall, part of the reason I’m not real excited about following that NAM solution:


Happy low pressure tracking tomorrow morning!

Chief Meteorologist Mark Nelsen


17 Responses to High Wind Watch Cancelled; More Typical “Windstorm” Instead

  1. pappoose in scappoose says:

    Warnings, Watches, Advisories
    1012 AM PDT SUN MAR 13 2016


  2. W7ENK says:

    NWS backing down even further now, pushing the time back and shortening the window for “strongest” winds. lol


  3. Eugene Dave says:

    Very breezy this morning down here. I’d estimate several gusts around 40 mph. Already have a few limbs down.

  4. Jackfrost says:

    Does anybody hear that heavy rain this morning? Now it’s slapping against the trailer pretty good. The rain has been ongoing since I woke up at 6:30am and even heavier now or it’s just because the small gusts are making it seem harder.

  5. It appears the strongest wind gusts will be south of my area (i.e.Georgia Strait near Victoria), but we’ll still have heavy rain this afternoon. Boy, that change to sunny weather can’t come soon enough…

  6. BlazerFan32 says:

    The UW MM5 NAM has the low centered over on the eastern side of the Olympic Mountains at around 5 PM today. It looks the most windy in the South Puget Sound area.

  7. Nevertheless, driving from the Olympic Peninsula to Albany tomorrow I’m going to get really bad gas mileage!

  8. NWS is still going with sustained winds to 45, gusts to 70 for my area. I hope it doesn’t materialize. I’ve had enough windstorms already this winter and it would likely rip the off the tarp that had to be installed on my roof earlier this week.

  9. Well I wasn’t expecting the EURO to differ much from the WRF, GFS and GEM, yet it is following the NAM. I’m quite honestly surprised. We’re within 12-18 hours and we can’t even manage solid model agreement on track or depth. That’s pretty ridiculous and maybe we should rely more on Water Vapor, 3hr Pressure Falls, and Buoy data right now.

  10. pappoose in scappoose says:

    Happy it is, Mark!

%d bloggers like this: